Welcome Guest | Sunday, February 12, 2012 02:58 AM Printer Friendly Page Printer Friendly Page | Register | Log-in  
Main Menu
· Home
· Contact Us
· Discussion Forums
· Fall TV Preview
· Fall TV: New shows
· Fall TV: Schedules
· Fall TV: Premieres
· FAQ
· News by topics
· Search
· TV Ratings System
· Web Links

Other places
The Hunger (Unofficial)
Linux OS Reviews
Really Funny Jokes

Who's Online
There are 147 unregistered users and 0 registered users on-line.

You can log-in or register for a user account here.


Professional Canadian Web Hosting
Start your own family, non-profit, blog or small business website today! - Check out our Web Hosting

Follow us!
     

Subscribe to Channel Canada by Email

Recommended
Take the Nature Challenge

 


Bell Reacts To CRTC's Decision
Posted on Monday, March 22, 2010 - 05:25 PM
Bell TV (ExpressVu)

Bell is disappointed with today's decision by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to force satellite and cable companies to negotiate a fee with broadcasters for the mandatory carriage of local television signals that are already available for free over the air. Implementation of the regime will take effect if the Federal Court of Appeal determines the CRTC has the jurisdiction to impose its preferred regime.

"Today's decision is bad news for Canadian consumers. The CRTC is prepared to have Canadians pay even more to subsidize profitable broadcasters and their ever-increasing spending on U.S. programming," said Kevin Crull, President of Bell Residential Services. "It is outrageous for the CRTC to completely ignore the huge profits broadcasters are making from their specialty channels, not to mention the fact that they are increasing what they spend in the U.S. while they are actually cutting Canadian content at the same time."

Canada's major TV broadcasters have campaigned relentlessly for additional revenues from Canadian satellite and cable customers. They persuaded the CRTC to accept this new subsidy despite the fact the Commission had twice before rejected similar demands.

"It is unfortunate that TV networks that are already receiving millions in consumer subsidies for the very local programming they continue to cut are allowed once again to dip their hands in the pockets of Canadian consumers," said Mirko Bibic, Bell's Senior Vice President of Regulatory and Government Affairs. "There is no public policy merit in imposing yet another regulatory tax on consumers - especially when this is money broadcasters will simply send south of the border. We intend to participate in the Federal Court of Appeal hearing. We do not believe the CRTC has the jurisdiction to impose this TV tax."

Bell TV has invested more than two billion dollars in its satellite TV service over the last 12 years. Despite success in attracting customers with a great product and considerable choice, including the most High Definition channels in Canada, Bell TV has yet to return a profit in the intensely competitive video market.

Note: Read the C.R.T.C.'s decision here




DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE

Print Version
2075
Share |


 


SPONSORS | Professional Web Hosting | DSL in Alberta & BC |

© 1999 - 2011 ChannelCanada.com

 

Page created in 0.085818 Seconds